Database

The immunities of States and international organisations

This database contains the original national contributions bringing together information on The immunities of States and international organisations

Information on the contribution

Member State
Finland
Themes
Type of document
Jurisprudence
Permanent link to the contribution
http://www.cahdidatabases.coe.int/C/Immunities/Finland/1993/93
Translations
THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE QUOTED AS FOLLOWS:
Database of the CAHDI "The immunities of States and international organisations" - contribution of Finland - Jurisprudence of 30/09/1993

Hanna Heusala (individual) v. Republic of Turkey (State)

Author(ity)

Supreme Court (Korkein oikeus)

Date of the decision, of the judgment

30/09/1993

Points of law

The Court established that the Finnish courts were not competent to consider labour disputes involving local employees of foreign missions when duties of the employees were closely related to the exercise of governmental authority.

Summary of the case

The case before the Supreme Court of Finland concerned a labour dispute between the Embassy of Turkey and a locally recruited employee, who had worked as a secretary and translator. The Supreme Court held that the European Convention on State Immunity was a valid source when analysing the rules and principles of customary international law.

The Supreme Court stated that, pursuant to the Convention, a State cannot claim immunity if the proceedings relate to a contract of employment between the State and an individual, where the work has to be performed on the territory of the forum State. However, the Court referred to Article 32 of the Convention, according to which "nothing in the present Convention shall affect privileges and immunities relating to the exercise of the functions of diplomatic missions and consular posts and of persons connected with them". On the basis of Article 32 and customary international law, the Court found that a foreign mission as an employer could invoke immunity from jurisdiction before a court of the receiving State when the labour dispute was closely related to the official duties of the mission.

The Court held that the duties of the Plaintiff were meant to serve the official duties of a member of the diplomatic staff of Turkey and was thus closely related to the exercise of governmental authority of Turkey. Therefore, Turkey enjoyed jurisdictional immunity in the case and the Finnish courts lacked subject matter jurisdiction.

Sources

Korkeimman oikeuden ratkaisuja 1993 II at 563.

Additional information (explanations, notes, etc.)

Although Finland is not a party to the European Convention on State Immunity, the Supreme Court referred to the Convention as a source when analysing the rules and principles of customary international law.